{"id":2918,"date":"2017-01-09T11:46:35","date_gmt":"2017-01-09T11:46:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nayrb.org\/~blog\/?p=2918"},"modified":"2017-01-09T04:26:09","modified_gmt":"2017-01-09T04:26:09","slug":"1997-the-year-they-made-contact","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/nayrb.org\/~blog\/2017\/01\/09\/1997-the-year-they-made-contact\/","title":{"rendered":"1997: The year they made Contact"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>20 years ago, I watched Contact in the theater with my family[1].  Tonight, I watched it again, with S.<\/p>\n<p>To me, it held up well as a movie.  All the characters were believable, and the science and the effects were well within the normal parameters of suspension of disbelief.<\/p>\n<p>What struck me[2] was how hopeful a movie it was, that our better natures would win out, that our endless curiosity would take us places we&#8217;ve never imagined.<\/p>\n<p>[Note that spoilers follow]<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s always interesting the things you remember 20 years later.  &#8220;Why not make two, at twice the price?&#8221;  The destruction scene.  The prime numbers sounding so ominously alien from the aether.  The speaking through her father.  The 18 hours of static[3].  <\/p>\n<p>Interestingly, I had remembered that 18 hours of static as being the vindication at the end of the movie, that she was not crazy, that something had indeed happened, but I had forgotten how much it was covered up.<\/p>\n<p>The one (gaping) plot hole I had missed the first time around was the absence of study and testing before a human was sent through the machine.  If you look at the history of the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Apollo_program\" target=\"_blank\">Apollo<\/a> program, you see that it was preceded by <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Project_Mercury\" target=\"_blank\">Mercury<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Project_Gemini\" target=\"_blank\">Gemini<\/a>, with dozens of sequential missions, each testing new parts, to make sure that each part of the system and plan were well-enough understood to ensure successful missions.  The idea that they would build a half-trillion-dollar system in Contact and not fully study it (especially if it&#8217;s generating strange EM radiation) before sending a human through it &#8216;strains credulity&#8217;.  Even the EM it&#8217;s radiating would be a fantastic discovery for humans.<\/p>\n<p>But I can understand how they would cut out things to make a move that was watchable, and which was able to spend its time focusing on the humans in the story.<\/p>\n<p>The alternative view of events that the NSA directory was trying to convince people of at the end of the movie was reminiscent (for me) of the big con[4] at the end of &#8216;Watchmen&#8217;, albeit at the opposite end of the hope-fear axis.<\/p>\n<p>Apparently, like <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Blade_Runner\" target=\"_blank\">Bladerunner<\/a>, the ending was supposed to keep your doubt alive as to whether the events she experienced had actually happened.  To me, it didn&#8217;t, as 18 hours of static (and whatever metallurgical data they could get from the sphere) would be enough to prove the story.<\/p>\n<p>I laughed, I cried, I am full of hope.  A new year dawns.  Time to use that hope to build something meaningful, starting with some words.<\/p>\n<p>[1]We immediately followed it with Men In Black.  I&#8217;ll leave it to you to enjoy this juxtaposition.<\/p>\n<p>[2]If you&#8217;d read or watched any Carl Sagan, this would probably not be surprising.  &#8220;The sky calls to us. If we do not destroy ourselves, we will one day venture to the stars.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Carl Sagan - &#039;A Glorious Dawn&#039;  ft Stephen Hawking (Symphony of Science)\" width=\"604\" height=\"453\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/zSgiXGELjbc?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>[3]I had remembered it as 18 minutes.<\/p>\n<p>[4]In &#8216;Contact&#8217;, it was posited that a billionaire had faked first contact to inspire humans to push themselves outwards.  In &#8216;Watchmen&#8217; (the graphic novel[5]), Adrian Veidt fakes an alien invasion to scare humans into working together against a common foe.<\/p>\n<p>[5]&#8217;Watchmen&#8217; the movie simplified the plot to have Doctor Manhattan be the scapegoat.  this lead to a much tighter movie, but slightly less appropriate for my analogy, however much he played with space and time.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>20 years ago, I watched Contact in the theater with my family[1]. Tonight, I watched it again, with S. To me, it held up well as a movie. All the characters were believable, and the science and the effects were well within the normal parameters of suspension of disbelief. What struck me[2] was how hopeful &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/nayrb.org\/~blog\/2017\/01\/09\/1997-the-year-they-made-contact\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">1997: The year they made Contact<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[26,25,37,22,16,18],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/nayrb.org\/~blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2918"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/nayrb.org\/~blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/nayrb.org\/~blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nayrb.org\/~blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nayrb.org\/~blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2918"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/nayrb.org\/~blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2918\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2920,"href":"http:\/\/nayrb.org\/~blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2918\/revisions\/2920"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/nayrb.org\/~blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2918"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nayrb.org\/~blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2918"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nayrb.org\/~blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2918"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}