{"id":2666,"date":"2016-09-08T03:23:06","date_gmt":"2016-09-08T03:23:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nayrb.org\/~blog\/?p=2666"},"modified":"2016-09-08T03:23:34","modified_gmt":"2016-09-08T03:23:34","slug":"the-art-and-words-of-comics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/nayrb.org\/~blog\/2016\/09\/08\/the-art-and-words-of-comics\/","title":{"rendered":"The Art and Words of Comics"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>What do you look for when you&#8217;re reading a comic?  The words?  The art?  Both?  Does one interfere with the other?<\/p>\n<p>I was talking with S recently, and I was extolling the virtues of <a href=\"http:\/\/galactanet.com\/comic\/view.php?strip=605\" target=\"_blank\">Casey and Andy<\/a>[1], one of my favourite web comics.  S mentioned that she had tried to read it multiple times (often at my behest), but had been unable to get into it because of the art[3].<\/p>\n<p>For me, I had briefly noticed the <a href=\"http:\/\/galactanet.com\/comic\/view.php?strip=1\" target=\"_blank\">bad art very early on in the run<\/a>, but <a href=\"http:\/\/galactanet.com\/comic\/view.php?strip=6\" target=\"_blank\">the ideas he played with, especially with non-standard comic framing were more than worth it<\/a>.  (And it didn&#8217;t really bother me much at all.)<\/p>\n<p>Thinking about it, I realized that the webcomics I like are generally very simple art-wise.  I&#8217;m not sure if I actively prefer webcomics with worse art, but I may prefer those with simpler art.  Some of the ones I read most often:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/questionablecontent.net\/\" target=\"_blank\">Questionable Content<\/a> (mature themes, sometimes nsfw)<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.giantitp.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Order of the Stick<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/xkcd.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">XKCD<\/a><\/p>\n<p>have very simple art, perhaps well done (I think), but very simple lines and drawing.<\/p>\n<p>Some of my other favourites are still simple, but (I think) most would say that they are reasonable artists:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/freefall.purrsia.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Freefall<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.prequeladventure.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Prequel Adventure<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/poisonedminds.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">SSDD<\/a> (sometimes nsfw)<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve stopped reading:<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/drmcninja.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Dr. McNinja<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.goblinscomic.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">Goblins<\/a> (often disturbing cartoon violence)<\/p>\n<p>perhaps because of the more complex\/busy art.  I know I stopped reading Goblins because I find the art a little too gory\/uncanny valley\/disquieting.<\/p>\n<p>I also enjoy:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/explosm.net\/comics\/3566\/\" target=\"_blank\">Cyanide &#038; Happiness<\/a> (Trigger warnings)<br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=PF9z-kEmic4\" target=\"_blank\">asdfmovie<\/a> (NSFW\/warning\/etc.)<\/p>\n<p>But they are both incredibly simple art.  Cyanide &#038; Happiness is probably the worst art of any on this list, but I enjoy it because of the humour.<\/p>\n<p>Among the graphic novels I&#8217;ve enjoyed are:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Transmetropolitan\" target=\"_blank\">Transmetropolitan<\/a> (nsfw, probably triggers in there too)<br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Watchmen\" target=\"_blank\">Watchmen<\/a> (natch) (movie was rated R)<br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ex_Machina_(comics)\" target=\"_blank\">Ex Machina<\/a> (some adult themes)<\/p>\n<p>I feel that all of these, their art enhances the story.  In Transmet, it really brings the world alive, and it works that you have a really busy future city, where everything is happening all the time.  You also get important information about Spider&#8217;s personality and how he treats people.  Watchmen is just a work of beauty woven on so many levels, and I like the vibrant colours of Ex Machina.  I feel that something more realistic would almost detract, bring things closer to the uncanny valley, perhaps.<\/p>\n<p>Interestingly, I have a perhaps similar reaction to music, that when I&#8217;m listening to a piece of music, I can really only listen to the music part of it, the words I can almost never hear, except when they are very clearly in the foreground, and\/or I&#8217;ve heard them many times before.  This may be related to being an instrumentalist in my previous life.<\/p>\n<p>tl;dr: I like the words of web comics.  I like it when the art is simple, or when the art if more complex and is cast in a supporting role to the story.  Art more than that can detract (for me, at least) from the words, which (in comics) are my favourite part.<\/p>\n<p>[1]This comic is perhaps one of his more bizarre comics, but I think a fair example of his artistic style\/talent.  He <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reddit.com\/r\/books\/comments\/2tyz6p\/i_am_andy_weir_author_of_the_martian_soon_to_be_a\/co3oln5\" target=\"_blank\">mentioned in his AMA<\/a>[2] that &#8220;I realized I hated doing the artwork. I just liked telling jokes to people and the art was a necessity for it. That was the main reason I stopped making the comic.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>[2]Also, you probably know him as Andy Weir, the guy who wrote &#8216;<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_Martian_(film)\" target=\"_blank\">The Martian<\/a>&#8216;. <\/p>\n<p>[3]You can see a takedown of his drawing of a different comic called &#8216;Cheshire Crossing&#8217; <a href=\"http:\/\/badwebcomicswiki.shoutwiki.com\/wiki\/Cheshire_Crossing\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What do you look for when you&#8217;re reading a comic? The words? The art? Both? Does one interfere with the other? I was talking with S recently, and I was extolling the virtues of Casey and Andy[1], one of my favourite web comics. S mentioned that she had tried to read it multiple times (often &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/nayrb.org\/~blog\/2016\/09\/08\/the-art-and-words-of-comics\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">The Art and Words of Comics<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[17,7,22,36],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/nayrb.org\/~blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2666"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/nayrb.org\/~blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/nayrb.org\/~blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nayrb.org\/~blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nayrb.org\/~blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2666"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/nayrb.org\/~blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2666\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2671,"href":"http:\/\/nayrb.org\/~blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2666\/revisions\/2671"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/nayrb.org\/~blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2666"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nayrb.org\/~blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2666"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nayrb.org\/~blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2666"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}